EMI FPGA SerDes Bypass
Download PDF
Simplified design and improved performance using EMI capacitors w/ Altera StratixII GX SerDes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9ebb/d9ebb1e847123a28e6f2ce1f87e969c07df73618" alt="EMI FPGA SerDes Bypass - Simplied Design"
Comparative Bypass Networks
SERDES transmit power supplies:
- 13 EMI Capacitors replace 38 0402 caps
- Plane inductance saturation for each supply is achieved w/ 2 EMI capacitors
Altera® Reference Design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a199/3a19994d33f4988b9a8aec0dc44a8fe257491d23" alt="20-hf-bypass-capacitors.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/565a6/565a69ec716d27d784b8ecbe780a7386179b06b7" alt="18-hf-bypass-capacitors.png"
EMI Modified Design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d41c9/d41c9e512091b278e8209d615f7739504191db4f" alt="6-x2y-bypass-capacitors.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d745/1d7455a7f95662c9a4a68b5240717aab28a10c5a" alt="7-x2y-bypass-capacitors.png"
EMI vs. MLCCs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6452/f64523945a12e88ea571c5d9cfb1d0cfaf34e7da" alt="mlcc-design.jpg"
MLCC Design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b929/9b929ac2ba226e4ac53859cdbf0750ec07f49629" alt="x2y-design.jpg"
EMI Design
Transmit Analog: VCCH
EMI Design
- – 2 x 330uF tantalum caps
- + 2 MLCCs + 7 EMI
- – 1D < 80mOhms
- equivalent resistive to 250MHz
- Ignores spatial effects and IC parasitics
- Spatial effects dominate above 10MHz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5576d/5576d40c0a7f75a983956cbeb190fb9ec39e6148" alt="transmit-analog-vcch.jpg"
Impedance Comparisons w/o IC
2-3X lower impedance 20MHz-100MHz w/ 7 caps instead of 20
- >2.5:1 Higher FRES
- 2.5:1 reduction in Q
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b931/3b931284f1586a3ed39fa97cea17b41e90713e54" alt="impedance-comparisons.jpg"
Original VCCTX and EMI Networks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c611/9c61193e63a7ffe8ff1990dd75ab93e940a3a7ab" alt="measured-vcctx-networks-vs-simulated-shorted-perimeter.jpg"
Original Network, FDTIM
- LBYPASS decreases with increasing freq.
- Near 20MHz about LTOTAL about 220pH
- Die / bypass PRF near 200MHz
- Bypass / PCB PRF near
EMI network selective zeroes
- Lower LBYPASS @ 20MHz up
- Zero for Die / bypass PRF
- Zero for PCB / bypass PRF
VCCTX PCB / Bypass Resonance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c611/9c61193e63a7ffe8ff1990dd75ab93e940a3a7ab" alt="measured-vcctx-networks-vs-simulated-shorted-perimeter.jpg"
Original network
- @ relatively low PRF
EMI Network
- Lower distributed L of 6/7 EMI caps raises to 580MHz
- Suppressed w/ single 100pF rated EMI
- Good suppression w/ conventional caps difficult due to high Q
- Measured results, PRF completely suppressed
3.125Gbps Performance PRBS7
EMI Redues jitter to 32ps p-p jitter
- vs 49ps in reference design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0459/a04595dbd7733590bb2f073aff843338b20b6b8e" alt="3.125gbps-performance-prbs7.png"
EMI improves better eye amplitude >5%
- 870mV pp @ sample point vs 820mV pp reference
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b1b4/9b1b4a7f31deb23449135a99fb8893ac8df30d3d" alt="3.125gbps-performance-prbs7-870mv.png"
3.125Gbps Performance PRBS23
Shows same improvements in jitter and eye amplitude:
- EMI 32ps p-p jitter vs 49ps in reference design
- EMI 870mV pp vs 820mV pp in reference design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/704f2/704f280208520d990d9b31b49d15a646c86d59d2" alt="3.125gbps-performance-prbs23.png"